APEC ROES-50 vs PUR PLUS FM-3700B — Which Should You Buy?

Side-by-side comparison of APEC ROES-50 and PUR PLUS FM-3700B. We compare specs, performance, and value to help you decide.

Updated 2026-03-09 Independently reviewed
APEC ROES-50

APEC ROES-50

8.6/10
$200 /one-time
VS
PUR PLUS FM-3700B

PUR PLUS FM-3700B

8.2/10
$45 /one-time

Feature Comparison

Feature APEC ROES-50 PUR PLUS FM-3700B
Type 5-stage RO 2-stage carbon
Capacity 50 GPD 100 gallons
Removes Lead, fluoride, chlorine Lead, chlorine
Tank 3 gallon
Waste Ratio 4:1
Installation DIY Under sink
Parts USA
Warranty 1 year 90 days
Certification NSF
Filter Life 3 months
Faucet Included

APEC ROES-50

Pros

  • Budget RO
  • 5-stage filtration
  • 99% removal
  • 50 GPD
  • Easy DIY install
  • Reliable
  • USA-made parts

Cons

  • Basic design
  • 4:1 waste ratio
  • No remineralization

PUR PLUS FM-3700B

Pros

  • Budget-friendly
  • NSF certified
  • Reduces lead, chlorine
  • 2-stage
  • Simple install
  • Dedicated faucet
  • Trusted brand

Cons

  • Basic filtration
  • Doesn't remove fluoride
  • Filter life 3 months

Our Verdict

APEC ROES-50

The best budget RO system—proven performance at the lowest price point for reverse osmosis.

20% Off — Limited Time, Check Now

PUR PLUS FM-3700B

The best budget under-sink filter—basic NSF-certified filtration at the lowest price.

Limited Offer — Check Today's Price

Our Methodology

We test each under-sink filter for contaminant reduction, installation ease, and long-term cost. No manufacturer has editorial influence.

Related Comparisons